Premium
Self‐Reported Physical Function As a Predictor of Hospitalization in the Lifestyle Interventions and Independence for Elders Study
Author(s) -
Callahan Kathryn E.,
Lovato Laura,
Miller Michael E.,
Marsh Anthony P.,
Fielding Roger A.,
Gill Thomas M.,
Groessl Erik J.,
Guralnik Jack,
King Abby C.,
Kritchevsky Stephen B.,
McDermott Mary M.,
Manini Todd,
Newman Anne B.,
Rejeski W. Jack
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
journal of the american geriatrics society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.992
H-Index - 232
eISSN - 1532-5415
pISSN - 0002-8614
DOI - 10.1111/jgs.15468
Subject(s) - medicine , psychological intervention , gerontology , independence (probability theory) , physical therapy , psychiatry , statistics , mathematics
Objectives To explore whether baseline scores on the Mobility Assessment Tool—short form (MAT‐sf), a brief, animated, computer‐based means of assessing mobility that predicts mobility disability, are associated with number of hospitalizations and time to first hospitalization over a median follow‐up of 2.7 years. Design Post hoc analysis of prospectively gathered data from the Lifestyle Interventions and Independence for Elders (LIFE) Study, a randomized clinical trial of lifestyle interventions to preserve mobility in older adults. Setting Eight U.S. academic medical centers. Participants Of 1,635 sedentary community‐dwelling older adults enrolled in LIFE, 1,574 completed baseline physical function screening including the MAT‐sf, with baseline scores ranging from 30.2 (low function) to 69.8 (high function) on a scale from 30 to 80. Measurements Number of hospitalizations and time to first hospitalization, adjusted for age, sex, race, living alone, clinical site, baseline comorbidities, number of prescription medications, and cognition. Results Of the 1,557 participants with data regarding hospitalization status, 726 (47%) had at least 1 hospitalization; 78% of these had 1 or 2 hospitalizations. For every 10‐point lower MAT‐sf score, the rate of all hospitalizations was 19% higher in those with lower scores (adjusted rate ratio=1.20, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.08–1.32, p<.001). Lower baseline MAT‐sf scores were also associated with greater risk of first hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio=1.20, 95% CI=1.09–1.32, p<.01, per 10‐point lower MAT‐sf score). Conclusion Low MAT‐sf scores identify older adults at risk of hospitalization; further study is needed to test interventions to reduce hospitalizations in these individuals.