z-logo
Premium
Effect of Clostridium difficile Prevalence in Hospitals and Nursing Homes on Risk of Infection
Author(s) -
Joyce Nina R.,
Mylonakis Eleftherios,
Mor Vincent
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of the american geriatrics society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.992
H-Index - 232
eISSN - 1532-5415
pISSN - 0002-8614
DOI - 10.1111/jgs.14838
Subject(s) - medicine , clostridium difficile , nursing homes , clostridium infections , cross infection , c difficile , nursing , intensive care medicine , family medicine , microbiology and biotechnology , antibiotics , biology
Objectives To assess the effect of facility Clostridium difficile infection ( CDI ) prevalence on risk of healthcare facility (HFC) acquired CDI. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Medicare fee‐for‐service ( FFS ) claims and skilled nursing facility ( SNF ) Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessments. Participants Medicare beneficiaries with 90 days or more of no contact with a HCF before a hospital admission without a CDI diagnosis. Participants were separated into two cohorts: discharged to the community and discharged to a SNF . Measurements Risk of HCF ‐acquired CDI associated with CDI prevalence at the index facility measured according to 30‐day rehospitalization with a discharge diagnosis of CDI or diagnosis in the SNF after admission. Hospital and SNF CDI prevalence were categorized into three groups: 0% and above and below the median value for facilities with greater than 0% prevalence. Results Of 817,900 eligible individuals, there were 553,423 admissions in the first cohort (discharged to the community) and 315,109 in the second (discharged to a SNF ). In the first cohort, the risk of HCF ‐acquired CDI was higher for individuals admitted to hospitals with CDI prevalence less than the median (relative risk ( RR ) = 1.58, 95% confidence interval ( CI ) = 1.18–2.12) and greater than the median ( RR = 2.56, 95% CI = 1.91–3.45) than for those with no CDI . In the second cohort, the risk of HCF ‐acquired CDI was greater for individuals admitted to a hospital ( RR = 1.89, 95% CI = 1.49–2.39) and a SNF ( RR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.31–1.67) with CDI prevalence greater than the median. Conclusion The risk of HCF ‐acquired CDI is greater for noninfected individuals admitted to hospitals and SNF s with a high prevalence of CDI .

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom