z-logo
Premium
Effect of a Home‐Based Palliative Care Program on Healthcare Use and Costs
Author(s) -
Brian Cassel J.,
Kerr Kathleen M.,
McClish Donna K.,
Skoro Nevena,
Johnson Suzanne,
Wanke Carol,
Hoefer Daniel
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of the american geriatrics society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.992
H-Index - 232
eISSN - 1532-5415
pISSN - 0002-8614
DOI - 10.1111/jgs.14354
Subject(s) - medicine , palliative care , health care , context (archaeology) , propensity score matching , retrospective cohort study , observational study , medicare advantage , intervention (counseling) , emergency medicine , family medicine , nursing , economics , economic growth , paleontology , pathology , biology
Objectives To evaluate the nonclinical outcomes of a proactive palliative care program funded and operated by a health system for Medicare Advantage plan beneficiaries. Design Observational, retrospective study using propensity‐based matching. Setting A health system in southern California. Participants Individuals who received the intervention between 2007 and 2014 (n = 368) were matched with 1,075 comparison individuals within each of four disease groups: cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, and dementia. All were known to be dead at the time of the retrospective study, were Medicare Advantage beneficiaries, and had 2 years of usage data before death. Median age at death for each disease group was older than 80. Intervention Home‐ and clinic‐based palliative care ( PC ) services provided by a multidisciplinary team. Measurements Outcomes included hospital costs, other healthcare costs, readmission rates, hospital admissions and bed days, intensive care unit use in final 30 days of life, and death within 30 days of an admission. Results Intervention participants in all four disease groups had less hospital use and lower hospital costs nonintervention participants, which drove lower overall healthcare costs. In the final 6 months of life, healthcare costs for the intervention groups stayed largely the same from month to month, whereas costs for comparison participants increased dramatically. Conclusion In the context of an alternative payment model in which the provider was “at risk” of bearing the costs of care, a proactive PC program helped to avoid the escalation in hospital use and costs commonly seen in the final months of life.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here