Premium
End‐of‐Life Discussions with Older Adults
Author(s) -
Kale Minal S.,
Ornstein Katherine A.,
Smith Cardinale B.,
Kelley Amy S.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of the american geriatrics society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.992
H-Index - 232
eISSN - 1532-5415
pISSN - 0002-8614
DOI - 10.1111/jgs.14285
Subject(s) - medicine , gerontology , medline , political science , law
Objectives To determine the prevalence of end‐of‐life ( EOL ) conversations with older adults. Design National Health and Aging Trends Study ( NHATS ), a prospective, longitudinal survey of Medicare beneficiaries. Setting Nationally representative. Participants A sample drawn from Wave 2 of the NHATS . Measurements The main outcome was the report of an EOL planning discussion, based upon the participant's response to the question “Have you talked to anyone about the types of medical treatment you would want or not want if you became seriously ill in the future?” Results Sixty‐one percent of the sample (n = 1,993 individuals, weighted n = 11,123,910) responded that they had discussed EOL treatment preferences with someone. In multivariate regression, factors associated with reporting an EOL discussion included being younger (adjusted odds ratio ( AOR ) = 1.70, 95% confidence interval ( CI ) = 1.17–2.47), having more education (high school degree: AOR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.02–2.07; some college: AOR = 2.03, 95% CI = 1.40–2.95), and having multiple chronic conditions ( AOR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.01–1.55). Black race was associated with lower odds of reporting a discussion ( AOR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.33–0.65). Conclusion Forty percent of a nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries had not discussed their preferences regarding EOL medical treatment. Promoting these conversations in clinical and nonclinical settings will be important to ensure that health care is delivered to individuals in a person‐centered manner.