Premium
Interventions to Address Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing in Community‐Dwelling Older Adults: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
Author(s) -
Clyne Barbara,
Fitzgerald Ciaran,
Quinlan Aisling,
Hardy Colin,
Galvin Rose,
Fahey Tom,
Smith Susan M.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of the american geriatrics society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.992
H-Index - 232
eISSN - 1532-5415
pISSN - 0002-8614
DOI - 10.1111/jgs.14133
Subject(s) - psychological intervention , medicine , randomized controlled trial , medline , systematic review , multidisciplinary approach , pharmacist , clinical study design , family medicine , clinical trial , nursing , pharmacy , surgery , social science , pathology , sociology , political science , law
Objectives To perform a systematic review to determine the effectiveness of interventions designed to reduce potentially inappropriate prescribing ( PIP ) in community‐dwelling older adults. Design Systematic review and narrative synthesis. Setting Primary and community care. Participants Community‐dwelling older adults. Measurements The primary outcome was change in PIP measured using implicit or explicit tools. Studies were grouped into organizational, professional, financial, regulatory, and multifaceted interventions. Results Twelve randomized controlled trials were identified with baseline PIP prevalence of 18% to 100%. Four of six organizational interventions reported a reduction in PIP , particularly through pharmacists conducting medication reviews. Evidence of the effectiveness of multidisciplinary teams was weak. Both of the two professional (targeting prescriber's directly) interventions were computerized clinical decision support interventions and were effective in decreasing new PIP but not existing PIP . Three of four multifaceted approaches were effective in reducing PIP . The risk of bias was often high, particularly in reporting selection bias. Conclusion Interventions including organizational (pharmacist interventions), professional (computerized clinical decision support systems), and multifaceted approaches appear beneficial in terms of reducing PIP , but the range of effect sizes reported was modest, and it is unclear whether such interventions can result in clinically significant improvements in patient outcomes. Ongoing assessment of interventions to reduce PIP is needed in community‐dwelling older adults, particularly in relation to preventing initiation of PIP .