Premium
Comorbidity in Drivers with Parkinson's Disease
Author(s) -
Ranchet Maud,
Tant Mark,
Akinwuntan Abiodun Emmanuel,
Neal Erin,
Devos Hannes
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of the american geriatrics society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.992
H-Index - 232
eISSN - 1532-5415
pISSN - 0002-8614
DOI - 10.1111/jgs.13942
Subject(s) - comorbidity , medicine , logistic regression , physical therapy , psychiatry
Objectives To determine the effect of comorbidity on fitness‐to‐drive recommendations that physicians and on‐road driving assessors make and to investigate the agreement in fitness‐to‐drive recommendations between physicians and on‐road driving assessors. Design Retrospective. Setting Data on comorbidities associated with Parkinson's disease ( PD ) and fitness‐to‐drive recommendations were investigated. Participants Individuals with PD who underwent an official on‐road test in Belgium (N = 72). Measurements Correlations between comorbidity and fitness‐to‐drive recommendations were calculated. Stepwise logistic regression models were used to investigate whether comorbidity was an independent predictor of fitness‐to‐drive recommendations (pass/fail) that the physicians or the on‐road assessors made. The percentage of agreement and the prevalence and bias‐adjusted kappa ( PABAK ) were used to investigate agreement between the physicians and the on‐road assessors. Results Moderate correlations were found between comorbidity and fitness‐to‐drive recommendations that the physicians ( ρ = 0.34, P = .004) and the on‐road assessors ( ρ = 0.30, P = .01) made. Comorbidity was the most important determinant (coefficient of determination = 0.16, P = .005) of the physicians fitness‐to‐drive recommendations. No significant effect of comorbidity on the on‐road recommendations was found. The physicians and the on‐road assessors agreed in 46 (64%) of the cases ( PABAK = 0.46, P < .001). Conclusion Comorbidity plays a role in physicians' recommendations of fitness to drive that may explain, in part, inconsistencies between physicians and on‐road assessors' fitness‐to‐drive recommendations. This study indicates the need for an interdisciplinary dialogue between physicians and on‐road assessors to reach a comprehensive fitness‐to‐drive decision.