Premium
Evaluation of an Automated Falls Detection Device in Nursing Home Residents
Author(s) -
Lipsitz Lewis A.,
Tchalla Achille E.,
Iloputaife Ikechukwu,
Gag Margaret,
Dole Kiran,
Su Zhen Zhong,
Klickstein Lloyd
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of the american geriatrics society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.992
H-Index - 232
eISSN - 1532-5415
pISSN - 0002-8614
DOI - 10.1111/jgs.13708
Subject(s) - medicine , concordance , fall prevention , poison control , nursing homes , occupational safety and health , injury prevention , false positive paradox , nursing , physical therapy , medical emergency , pathology , machine learning , computer science
Objectives To determine the concordance between falls recorded using an investigational fall detection device and falls reported by nursing staff in a nursing home. Design Six‐month prospective study. Setting Hebrew SeniorLife nursing home units in Boston, Massachusetts. Participants Nursing home residents with a documented history of at least one fall within 12 months before consent (N = 62, mean age 86.2 ± 8.1, 66% female). Intervention Subjects continuously wore an automated falls detection device on a pendant around their neck. The device contained triaxial accelerometers set to detect a rapid change in position that was interpreted as a fall. Measurements Healthcare staff reported daily falls, defined as unexpected events in which residents were found on the floor, and the number of these falls was compared with the number of falls recorded according to the device. Results Seven of 37 residents whom nursing staff found on the floor had a fall recorded according to the device (19%). The device did not identify any of the clinical fall events in 23 of the 37 fallers (62%). The device detected 17 of 89 total falls that nursing staff recorded (sensitivity 19%) within an 8‐hour time window. Of 128 fall events that the device recorded, 17 were concordant with nursing reports (13%) within an 8‐hour time window, and 111 (87%) were false positives. Conclusion There is poor concordance between falls recorded using the investigational fall detection device and falls to the floor that nursing home staff report.