Premium
Serum Helicobacter pylori antibody reactivity in seven Asian countries using an automated latex aggregation turbidity assay
Author(s) -
Akada Junko,
TshibanguKabamba Evariste,
Tuan Vo Phuoc,
Kurogi Shusaku,
Matsuo Yuichi,
Ansari Shamshul,
Doohan Dalla,
Phuc Bui Hoang,
Subsomwong Phawinee,
Waskito Langgeng Agung,
Binh Tran Thanh,
Nguyen Lam Tung,
Khien Vu Van,
Dung Ho Dang Quy,
Miftahussurur Muhammad,
Syam Ari Fahrial,
Tshering Lotay,
Vilaichone Rathakorn,
Mahachai Varocha,
Ratanachuek Thawee,
Shrestha Pradeep Krishna,
Yee Than Than,
Htet Kyaw,
Aftab Hafeza,
Matsuhisa Takeshi,
Uchida Tomohisa,
Okimoto Tadayoshi,
Mizukami Kazuhiro,
Kodama Masaaki,
Murakami Kazunari,
Takahashi Naohiko,
Yamaoka Yoshio
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of gastroenterology and hepatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.214
H-Index - 130
eISSN - 1440-1746
pISSN - 0815-9319
DOI - 10.1111/jgh.15467
Subject(s) - helicobacter pylori , medicine , receiver operating characteristic , antibody , antigen , gastroenterology , atrophy , immunology
Background and Aim To determine the application range of diagnostic kits utilizing anti‐ Helicobacter pylori antibody, we tested a newly developed latex aggregation turbidity assay (latex) and a conventional enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (E‐plate), both containing Japanese H. pylori protein lysates as antigens, using sera from seven Asian countries. Methods Serum samples (1797) were obtained, and standard H. pylori infection status and atrophy status were determined by culture and histology (immunohistochemistry) using gastric biopsy samples from the same individuals. The two tests (enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay and latex) were applied, and receiver operating characteristics analysis was performed. Results Area under the curve (AUC) from the receiver operating characteristic of E‐plate and latex curves were almost the same and the highest in Vietnam. The latex AUC was slightly lower than the E‐plate AUC in other countries, and the difference became statistically significant in Myanmar and then Bangladesh as the lowest. To consider past infection cases, atrophy was additionally evaluated. Most of the AUCs decreased using this atrophy‐evaluated status; however, the difference between the two kits was not significant in each country, but the latex AUC was better using all samples. Practical cut‐off values were 3.0 U/mL in the E‐test and 3.5 U/mL in the latex test, to avoid missing gastric cancer patients to the greatest extent possible. Conclusions The kits were applicable in all countries, but new kits using regional H. pylori strains are recommended for Myanmar and Bangladesh. Use of a cut‐off value lower than the best cut‐off value is essential for screening gastric cancer patients.