Premium
Risk factors of early rebleeding in the endoscopic management of colonic diverticular bleeding
Author(s) -
Honda Hirokazu,
Ishii Naoki,
Takasu Ayaka,
Shiratori Yasutoshi,
Omata Fumio
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of gastroenterology and hepatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.214
H-Index - 130
eISSN - 1440-1746
pISSN - 0815-9319
DOI - 10.1111/jgh.14669
Subject(s) - medicine , gastroenterology , hazard ratio , colonoscopy , confidence interval , proportional hazards model , incidence (geometry) , cumulative incidence , risk factor , surgery , colorectal cancer , cancer , cohort , physics , optics
Background and Aim The risk factors for early rebleeding following the management of colonic diverticular bleeding (CDB) are unclear. This study aimed to determine the risk factors for early rebleeding following initial colonoscopy. Methods Overall, 370 patients with CDB were divided as having presumptive (229) or definite CDB with stigmata of recent hemorrhage (141) on the basis of initial colonoscopy. Definite CDB cases were treated by either endoscopic clipping (EC) or endoscopic band ligation (EBL) as a first‐line treatment. Time‐to‐event analysis for early rebleeding was performed by Kaplan–Meier methods with log‐rank test between the three groups (presumptive, EC, and EBL). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify risk factors for early rebleeding. Results There were 38 and 103 patients in the EC and EBL groups, respectively. Early rebleeding developed in 61 cases (16.5%). The cumulative incidence rates of early rebleeding at 1, 5, and 30 days were 7.7%, 16.4%, and 17.9% in the presumptive group; 1.9%, 7.0%, and 9.5% in the EBL group; and 2.6%, 34.9%, and 37.7% in the EC group, respectively (log‐rank test, P = 0.00059). Moreover, 90.2% of early rebleeding occurred within 5 days. Adjusted hazard ratio (HR) was marginally lower in the presumptive group (HR = 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.26–1.01; P = 0.052) and significantly lower in the EBL‐treated group than in the EC group (HR = 0.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.09–0.50; P = 0.0004). Conclusions Most early rebleeding occurred within 5 days after initial colonoscopy. EC was less effective than EBL in terms of early rebleeding.