Premium
Stepwise application of fibrosis index based on four factors, red cell distribution width–platelet ratio, and aspartate aminotransferase–platelet ratio for compensated hepatitis B fibrosis detection
Author(s) -
Chen YongPeng,
Hu XiaoMin,
Liang XieEr,
Huang LiWen,
Zhu YouFu,
Hou JinLin
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
journal of gastroenterology and hepatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.214
H-Index - 130
eISSN - 1440-1746
pISSN - 0815-9319
DOI - 10.1111/jgh.13811
Subject(s) - medicine , cirrhosis , transient elastography , gastroenterology , fibrosis , receiver operating characteristic , mean platelet volume , red blood cell distribution width , platelet , elastography , pathology , liver fibrosis , radiology , ultrasound
Background and Aim Fibrosis index based on four factors (FIB‐4) and aspartate aminotransferase–platelet ratio (APRI) were validated with unsatisfactory efficiency. Routine hematology index red cell distribution width–platelet ratio (RPR) had been tried in liver fibrosis detection. This study tries to evaluate the stepwise application of FIB‐4, RPR, and APRI in detecting chronic hepatitis B (CHB) fibrosis. Methods A total of 246 compensated CHB patients who underwent liver biopsies, transient elastography, and routine blood tests including complete blood count were included. Dual cut‐offs were determined to exclude or include cirrhosis diagnosis. Performance of stepwise combining routine biomarkers including RPR, FIB‐4, and APRI were statistically analyzed. Results The Metavir F0, F1, F2, F3, and F4 were identified in 2.4%, 22.0%, 32.1%, 24.0%, and 19.5% of the eligible patients, respectively. The area under receiver operating characteristics curves for detecting significant fibrosis and cirrhosis were 0.853 and 0.883 for transient elastography; 0.719 and 0.807 for FIB‐4; 0.638 and 0.791 for RPR; 0.720 and 697 for APRI; and 0.618 and 0.760 for mean platelet volume–platelet ratio, respectively. The proportion of patient determined as cirrhosis or non‐cirrhosis was 65.9% by transient elastography, 36.9% by FIB‐4, 30.5% by RPR, and 19.5% by APRI, respectively. These numbers for determining significant fibrosis were 49.6%, 24.2%, 21.5%, and 23.6% in the same order. Detected by stepwise application of FIB‐4, RPR, and APRI, 41.5% and 52.8% of patients could be determined the state of significant fibrosis and cirrhosis, respectively. Conclusions In source‐limited settings without transient elastography, stepwise applying FIB‐4, RPR, and APRI could free nearly half of CHB patients from liver biopsies in detecting significant fibrosis and cirrhosis.