z-logo
Premium
A Policy Paradox: Response to Theodora Ooms
Author(s) -
Strach Patricia
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of family theory and review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.454
H-Index - 17
eISSN - 1756-2589
pISSN - 1756-2570
DOI - 10.1111/jftr.12311
Subject(s) - politics , battle , face (sociological concept) , government (linguistics) , political science , public policy , public administration , sociology , law , history , social science , linguistics , philosophy , archaeology
It's hard to look at the 2018 family separation policies of the U.S. federal government (and ensuing uproar) at the border with Mexico and not think that family policy should play a key role in American politics. But it doesn't. As Ooms argues in her masterful recounting of the history of family policy, the field has made major advances, but family policy remains largely unknown and undervalued by academics, policymakers, media, and the general public. Ooms herself says that it would be helpful “if more political scientists were interested in family issues as well as more family scholars and practitioners learned about political science and policymaking.” As a political scientist, I can say definitively that writing about families and public policy is an uphill battle in my field. The challenges that I face in doing so are not that different from what family policy scholars face more generally.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here