Premium
Contributions of Social Learning Theory to the Promotion of Healthy Relationships: Asset or Liability?
Author(s) -
Johnson Matthew D.,
Bradbury Thomas N.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
journal of family theory and review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.454
H-Index - 17
eISSN - 1756-2589
pISSN - 1756-2570
DOI - 10.1111/jftr.12057
Subject(s) - closeness , psychological intervention , social learning theory , psychology , distress , foundation (evidence) , promotion (chess) , social psychology , liability , asset (computer security) , social learning , psychotherapist , business , computer science , political science , pedagogy , mathematical analysis , mathematics , computer security , finance , psychiatry , politics , law
Although social learning theory provides the conceptual basis for behavioral interventions designed to treat and prevent relationship distress, the results of large, recently published experiments cast doubt on the long‐term viability of this approach. For example, couple therapies can produce lasting improvements in relationships, yet these improvements do not appear to be mediated by changes in communication in the manner suggested by social learning theory. Preventive interventions that teach couples communication skills produce inconsistent effects on communication and unexpectedly small effects on relationship outcomes. Because social learning theory may not provide the strongest foundation for relationship‐sustaining interventions, new approaches are needed, especially those that articulate how diverse contexts and life circumstances constrain couples' opportunities for closeness and stability.