z-logo
Premium
Reduction of Escherichia coli O157:H7 population on baby spinach leaves by liquid sanitizers
Author(s) -
Pyatkovskyy Taras,
Shynkaryk Mykola,
Yousef Ahmed,
Sastry Sudhir K.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of food process engineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.507
H-Index - 45
eISSN - 1745-4530
pISSN - 0145-8876
DOI - 10.1111/jfpe.12479
Subject(s) - hand sanitizer , spinach , citric acid , chemistry , population , food science , escherichia coli , chlorine , peracetic acid , inoculation , sodium hypochlorite , microbiology and biotechnology , horticulture , biology , biochemistry , medicine , organic chemistry , environmental health , gene , hydrogen peroxide
The effectiveness of various liquid sanitizers and methods of application against Escherichia coli on baby spinach was investigated. Inoculated spinach was treated with (i) Pro‐San L (commercially prepared solution containing 0.66% citric acid, 0.036% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS); (ii) chlorine solution (200 ppm), alone or with addition of 0.036% SDS; and (iii) aqueous solution of 0.66% levulinic acid with 0.036% SDS. Population reduction in response to these treatments ranged between 2.1 and 2.8 log CFU/g. No significant difference ( p  > .05) was found among tested sanitizers in microbial count reduction. Spraying, dipping, and “dry” vacuum impregnation methods of Pro‐San L application were compared. Dipping was the most effective in reducing E. coli O157:H7 population (4.4 log CFU/g reduction). Dry vacuum impregnation was less effective (3.3 log CFU/g reduction) and caused damage to the produce. The effectiveness of spray Pro‐San L application and holding for prolonged time (up to 3 days) was also evaluated. However, increasing time of exposure to organic acid sanitizer did not increase sanitizing effectiveness and led to progressive damage of spinach leaves.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here