z-logo
Premium
Crossroads: The Intersection of Immigrant Enforcement and the Child Welfare System
Author(s) -
Hidalgo Rosie
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
juvenile and family court journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.155
H-Index - 19
eISSN - 1755-6988
pISSN - 0161-7109
DOI - 10.1111/jfcj.12010
Subject(s) - aunt , immigration , foster care , criminology , enforcement , foster parents , jurisdiction , law enforcement , political science , law , psychology
D iana's children were placed in foster care when they were one‐ and three‐year‐olds. Their mother was arrested when she fought back to defend herself against an attack by her abusive boyfriend, T homas. T homas assaulted her in her apartment when she tried to end their relationship. A neighbor heard screams and called the police. When officers arrived, T homas told his version of the events, but D iana was not able to communicate with the officers, since they did not speak S panish and did not obtain the assistance of interpreters. The officers saw scratches on T homas and a possible bite mark, in addition to bruises and scratches on D iana, arrested both of them, and called Child Protective Services ( CPS ) to take the children. Immigration and Customs Enforcement ( ICE ) soon issued a detainer when they obtained a copy of D iana's fingerprints through the Secure Communities program in effect in her local jurisdiction. Upon further review of the circumstances, the prosecutor decided to drop the charges against D iana; however, ICE took custody of her. She was subsequently transferred to a different immigrant detention center 300 miles away. The CPS caseworker placed D iana's children in temporary foster care with foster parents who did not speak S panish, instead of with a willing aunt who had undocumented immigration status. D iana's children, born in the U nited S tates, are U . S . citizens. As the months passed, the children were no longer learning S panish. The children did not visit with or talk with their mother for over six months because the CPS caseworker was unsure of D iana's whereabouts and how to communicate with her, despite that the original case plan called for reunification. As a result, the goal of the case plan was revised to pursue the termination of parental rights instead of family reunification.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here