z-logo
Premium
Differences in morphological growth trajectories between greenside darter Etheostoma blennioides populations from two distinct drainages
Author(s) -
Geheber Aaron D.,
Miller Destini C.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of fish biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.672
H-Index - 115
eISSN - 1095-8649
pISSN - 0022-1112
DOI - 10.1111/jfb.14193
Subject(s) - etheostoma , biology , allometry , snout , ecology , ecomorphology , morphology (biology) , riffle , benthic zone , zoology , fish <actinopterygii> , fishery , habitat
Abstract The greenside darter Etheostoma blennioides is a small‐bodied benthic stream fish that occurs in multiple drainages of the eastern USA. Previous studies have revealed some morphological differentiations among greensides from isolated drainage systems but growth relationships among functional morphological characteristics have not been examined within and between populations. Specifically, we tested for differences in functional morphology and allometric distinctions in morphological growth trajectories between greenside populations from two drainages, the Osage River and White River. Morphological differences between individuals of the two drainages included more dorso‐ventrally compressed bodies, longer snouts and larger jaw features in White River darters. Furthermore, body depth, snout length and jaw width grow at significantly different trajectories in individuals of the two drainages. Individuals of the White River drainage (generally a higher gradient stream system) become comparatively more streamlined and develop proportionately larger feeding related traits during growth. These results suggest that individuals of both drainages share a similar morphology during early life but deviate during continued development and this may be partially due to environmentally induced plastic response. This study represents a novel approach for comparing morphological development among fish populations and presents environmental factors ( e.g ., stream gradient and elevation) that potentially influence functional characteristics.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here