Premium
Rearing environment affects spatial learning in juvenile Chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha
Author(s) -
Cogliati Karen M.,
Unrein Julia R.,
Schreck Carl B.,
Noakes David L. G.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of fish biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.672
H-Index - 115
eISSN - 1095-8649
pISSN - 0022-1112
DOI - 10.1111/jfb.14083
Subject(s) - oncorhynchus , chinook wind , hatchery , biology , juvenile , fishery , fish hatchery , juvenile fish , fish <actinopterygii> , zoology , aquaculture , ecology , fish farming
We tested the prediction that a complex physical rearing environment would enhance short‐term spatial memory as assessed by learning ability in a spatial navigation task in juvenile Chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha . We reared fish in two low‐density treatments, where fish were either in bare fiberglass tanks (bare) or in tanks with physical structure (complex). We also tested conventionally reared high‐density hatchery fish to compare with these other experimental treatments. Our reason for including this third hatchery treatment is that the two low‐density treatments, aside from the manipulation of structure, followed a rearing programme that is designed to produce fish with more wild‐like characteristics. We tested individually marked fish for seven consecutive days and recorded movement and time to exit a testing maze. Stimulus conspecific fish outside the exit of the maze provided positive reinforcement for test fish. Fish from the bare treatment were less likely to exit the start box compared with fish in the complex and hatchery treatments. However, fish in the hatchery treatment were significantly more likely to exit the maze on their own compared with both the bare and complex treatments. Hatchery fish effectively learned the task as shown by a decrease in the number of mistakes over time, but the number of mistakes was significantly greater on the first day of trials. Increasing habitat complexity with structure may not necessarily promote spatial learning ability, but differences between hatchery and experimental treatments in rearing density and motivation to be near conspecifics likely led to observed behavioural differences.