Premium
Development and maintenance of surface gloss of dental composites after polishing and brushing: Review of the literature
Author(s) -
AmayaPajares Silvia P.,
Koi Kiyono,
Watanabe Hidehiko,
Costa Juliana B.,
Ferracane Jack L.
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.919
H-Index - 60
eISSN - 1708-8240
pISSN - 1496-4155
DOI - 10.1111/jerd.12875
Subject(s) - gloss (optics) , materials science , polishing , composite material , abrasion (mechanical) , surface roughness , abrasive , particle size , surface finish , toothbrush , brush , chemistry , coating
Objective To describe the effect of the composites' composition to produce high surface smoothness/gloss using finishers/polishers, and to assess maintained smoothness/gloss under toothbrush abrasion. Materials and methods PubMed papers published from January 01, 2000 to September 01, 2021 were included, and keywords used were: filler particle size, shape, amount of dental composites; finishing/polishing, gloss/roughness, and toothbrush abrasion of composites. Seventy‐five in‐vitro studies were included in this literature review. Forty‐six articles assessed filler particle size/composition/shape and distribution to obtain high gloss/smoothness on different formulations; and the finishers/polishers effect on these materials. Twenty‐nine papers assessed toothbrush abrasion of composites. Results Suprananofill/nanofill/microfills typically showed the smoothest and glossiest surfaces compared to nanohybrid, microhybrid and hybrid composites. Microfill (0.04–0.07 μm, 71–88 GU); suprananofill (0.001–0.8 μm, 52–92 GU), microhybrids (0.05–0.35 μm, 35–95 GU) and nanohybrids (0.05–0.21 μm, 66–97 GU). Composites with small, spherical particles tend to show smoother, glossier surfaces and more wear resistant compared to resin composites with larger or irregular particles. Several studies showed higher roughness and reduced gloss after toothbrush abrasion. Conclusions Within the limitations of this study, suprananofill/nanofill/microfill composites tended to show the smoothest/glossiest surfaces due to smaller particle size. Composites with small, spherical particles tended to show smoother/glossier surfaces. Overall, toothbrush abrasion showed higher surface roughness and reduced gloss. Clinical Significance Suprananofills/nanofills/microfills had good polishability and polish retention due to their smaller particle size. The effectiveness of a polishing system is material‐dependent. In general, Enhance‐PoGo, Sof‐Lex discs, and Sof‐Lex Spiral wheels showed similar level of smoothness.