Premium
Effect of mouth rinses on optical properties of CAD‐CAM materials used for laminate veneers and crowns
Author(s) -
Sasany Rafat,
ErgunKunt Goknil,
Yilmaz Burak
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.919
H-Index - 60
eISSN - 1708-8240
pISSN - 1496-4155
DOI - 10.1111/jerd.12720
Subject(s) - veneer , mouth rinse , color difference , dentistry , materials science , crown (dentistry) , lithium disilicate , significant difference , cubic zirconia , resin composite , composite material , composite number , mathematics , medicine , computer science , ceramic , statistics , filter (signal processing) , computer vision
Objective The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of mouth rinses on the color and translucency of three computer‐aided design and computer‐aided manufacturing (CAD‐CAM) restorative materials in laminate veneer and crown thicknesses. Methods Specimens from two different 5Y‐TZP zirconia (InCoris TZI (IT), and Zirkonzahn (ZH)) and lithium disilicate (IPS e.max CAD [IC]) in two different thicknesses (0.7 mm for laminate veneer, and 1.5 mm for crown) were sectioned. All specimens were colored with an A2‐shade liquid, and the baseline color values were recorded according to the CIELab system with a spectrophotometer. Each group was divided into two subgroups ( n = 15) according to the immersion solution: two different mouth rinses, KL (Klorhex), and LI (Listerine, cool mint) for 180 hours. The color coordinates (L*, a*, b*) of the specimens were measured before and after immersion in a mouth rinse, and TP and ΔE 00 color differences were calculated by using the CIEDE2000 color difference formula. A 3‐way ANOVA, Bonferroni test, and 1‐sample t tests were used to analyze the data (α = 0.05). Results The 3‐way ANOVA revealed a significant interaction of material, thickness, and mouth rinse for translucency parameter and color difference (ΔE 00 ) data ( p < 0.001). TP decreased for both zirconia materials in laminate veneer thickness when immersed in LI mouth rinse ( p < 0.05). No difference was found among the TP mean values of three materials in crown thickness after immersed in mouth rinses ( p > 0.826). Both zirconia materials immersed in LI showed greater discoloration than after immersed in KL ( p < 0.05). A significant difference was found in color change values among three materials for the laminate veneer thickness after immersed in LI ( p < 0.001). However, all color difference values were within the clinical acceptability threshold, except for when ZH in laminate veneer thickness was immersed in LI. Conclusions The color change of ZH zirconia with LI mouth rinse in laminate veneer thickness was high. For both zirconia ceramics, translucency decreased and the color was less stable in laminate veneer thickness after immersed in LI compared to the crown thickness. Clinical significance The results of this in vitro study suggest that long‐term use of alcohol‐containing mouth rinse may alter the optical properties of tested CAD‐CAM materials in tested laminate veneer thickness. For color stability with the long term use of tested mouth rinses, lithium disilicate may be preferred for both types of restorations.