z-logo
Premium
Shade Correspondence, Color, and Translucency Differences between Human Dentine and a CAD/CAM Hybrid Ceramic System
Author(s) -
PopCiutrila IoanaSofia,
Dudea Diana,
Eugenia Badea Mândra,
Moldovan Mărioara,
Cîmpean Sanda Ileana,
Ghinea Razvan
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.919
H-Index - 60
eISSN - 1708-8240
pISSN - 1496-4155
DOI - 10.1111/jerd.12195
Subject(s) - anterior teeth , posterior teeth , dentistry , orthodontics , dental ceramics , materials science , ceramic , medicine , composite material , cubic zirconia
Objective To determine the shade correspondence between human dentine and two versions of a CAD/CAM hybrid ceramic system and to investigate color and translucency differences between these materials. Materials and Methods Twenty‐four samples of different shades and opacities were fabricated from Vita Enamic CAD/CAM ceramic blocks. Human dentine samples were obtained from 73 extracted maxillary teeth. Color coordinates of all samples were measured using VitaEasyshade spectrophotometer. The translucency parameter (TP) and Δ E a b *and Δ E 00color differences, with respect to human dentine of anterior and posterior teeth, were calculated. Results Vita Enamic Translucent was the best match for anterior teeth (>90% of cases) while Vita Enamic T 3M2 was the best option for the dentine samples of posterior teeth in 78.8% ( Δ E a b * ) and 54.5% ( Δ E 00 ) of the cases. The smallest differences in translucency ( Δ T P ) with the dentine samples of anterior teeth were obtained for Vita Enamic T 3M2 (92.5%) and with those of posterior teeth for Vita Enamic HT 1M2 (45.4%). Conclusions VITA Enamic Translucent is the best option as color match for both anterior and posterior teeth dentine. In terms of translucency, VITA Enamic Translucent closely matched anterior teeth dentine while for posterior teeth, VITA Enamic HT was the best option. Clinical Significance The results of the present study could help clinicians in their decision of choosing a specific shade and translucency for their anterior or posterior esthetic restorations with hybrid ceramics. (J Esthet Restor Dent 28:S46–S55, 2016)

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here