Premium
Dual Jaw Treatment of Edentulism Using Implant‐Supported Monolithic Zirconia Fixed Prostheses
Author(s) -
AlTarawneh Sandra,
Limmer Bryan,
Reside Glenn J.,
Cooper Lyndon
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.919
H-Index - 60
eISSN - 1708-8240
pISSN - 1496-4155
DOI - 10.1111/jerd.12137
Subject(s) - edentulism , dentistry , prosthesis , cubic zirconia , implant , dental prosthesis , materials science , medicine , orthodontics , ceramic , surgery , composite material
This case report describes restoration of the edentulous maxilla and mandible with implant supported fixed prostheses using monolithic zirconia, where the incisal edges and occluding surfaces were made of monolithic zirconia. Edentulism is a debilitating condition that can be treated with either a removable or fixed dental prosthesis. The most common type of implant‐supported fixed prosthesis is the metal acrylic (hybrid), with ceramo‐metal prostheses being used less commonly in complete edentulism. However, both of these prostheses designs are associated with reported complications of screw loosening or fracture and chipping of acrylic resin and porcelain. Monolithic zirconia implant‐supported fixed prostheses have the potential for reduction of such complications. In this case, the CAD / CAM concept was utilized in fabrication of maxillary and mandibular screw‐retained implant‐supported fixed prostheses using monolithic zirconia. Proper treatment planning and execution coupled with utilizing advanced technologies contributes to highly esthetic results. However, long‐term studies are required to guarantee a satisfactory long‐term outcome of this modality of treatment. Clinical Significance This case report describes the clinical and technical procedures involved in fabrication of maxillary and mandibular implant‐supported fixed prostheses using monolithic zirconia as a treatment of edentulism, and proposes the possible advantages associated with using monolithic zirconia in eliminating dissimilar interfaces in such prostheses that are accountable for the most commonly occurring technical complication for these prostheses being chipping and fracture of the veneering material.