z-logo
Premium
Advanced serious illness, multimorbidity, and multibeneficence: The role of communication
Author(s) -
Cohn Jeffrey
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
journal of evaluation in clinical practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.737
H-Index - 73
eISSN - 1365-2753
pISSN - 1356-1294
DOI - 10.1111/jep.12706
Subject(s) - conversation , multimorbidity , psychological intervention , pathological , medicine , focus (optics) , scale (ratio) , psychology , psychiatry , communication , pathology , comorbidity , physics , optics , quantum mechanics
Sturmberg et al write about multimorbidity as “several diagnosable diseases within the same individual.”[1][Sturmberg JP, 2017] They posit that this syndrome is the result of multiple interconnected disturbances reflecting scale‐free, fractal signs of pathology ranging from biochemical/hormonal alterations at one end of a spectrum to community and societal ills at the other. In this commentary, I will be focusing on 3 perspectives: 1) a preterminal phase of multimorbidity that is indicative of that loss of reparative or even homeokinetic properties, known by some as “advanced serious illness”[2][, ]; 2) the manifestations of advanced serious illness multimorbidity that, using the same networks that connect into the patient, are signs of this syndrome at the levels of the immediate family/friend social network, the broader community, and society at large; and 3) the potential for these same networks that transmit pathological forces to convey the positive effects of therapeutic interventions in a scale‐free manner, with a focus on how conversation can lead to what I'm calling “multibeneficence.”

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom