Premium
Evaluation of a novel strategy of triage in the haematology ambulatory care setting
Author(s) -
Slusar Joanna,
Couban Stephen,
Shivakumar Sudeep Pappur
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of evaluation in clinical practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.737
H-Index - 73
eISSN - 1365-2753
pISSN - 1356-1294
DOI - 10.1111/jep.12616
Subject(s) - medicine , referral , family medicine , triage , ambulatory , ambulatory care , cohort , managed care , abnormality , patient satisfaction , pediatrics , emergency medicine , health care , surgery , psychiatry , economics , economic growth
Background In 2010, wait‐times for new patients referred to see a haematologist at our outpatient tertiary care centre clinic exceeded 6 months. The provision of written recommendations for a subset of referred patients was undertaken to reduce patient wait‐times. These recommendation letters outlined possible causes of the abnormality for which the patient was being referred and suggested a course of action for follow‐up, and patients were then managed by their referring practitioner. We sought to characterize the cohort of patients for whom written recommendations were written and assess whether written recommendations were a satisfactory alternative for the referring practitioner. Methods All haematology patient referrals managed with written recommendations in 2010 were included in the study and were assessed one year later. Referring practitioners who received written recommendations were sent a short survey to evaluate their satisfaction with this process. Results A total of 444 of 2400 referrals were managed with a letter. At 1‐year follow‐up, 58 (13%, 95% CI) of the abnormalities which prompted the referral had resolved and 201 (45%, 95%CI) had remained stable. There was a single haematology‐related death during the 1‐year follow‐up and the haematological abnormality worsened in 4 (1%) patients. Of 203 (71%) referring practitioners who responded to the satisfaction survey, 90% (95% CI) indicated that they would be satisfied with written recommendations in the future. Interpretation The provision of written recommendations appears to be a safe and satisfactory alternative to an inperson outpatient assessment in certain well‐defined subsets of stable outpatients with haematologic abnormalities.