Premium
Medication errors room: a simulation to assess the medical, nursing and pharmacy staffs' ability to identify errors related to the medication‐use system
Author(s) -
Daupin Johanne,
Atkinson Suzanne,
Bédard Pascal,
Pelchat Véronique,
Lebel Denis,
Bussières JeanFrançois
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of evaluation in clinical practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.737
H-Index - 73
eISSN - 1365-2753
pISSN - 1356-1294
DOI - 10.1111/jep.12558
Subject(s) - pharmacy , medicine , nursing , multidisciplinary approach , set (abstract data type) , health care , patient safety , family medicine , medical emergency , computer science , programming language , social science , sociology , economics , economic growth
Rationale, aims and objectives The medication‐use system in hospitals is very complex. To improve the health professionals' awareness of the risks of errors related to the medication‐use system, a simulation of medication errors was created. The main objective was to assess the medical, nursing and pharmacy staffs' ability to identify errors related to the medication‐use system using a simulation. The secondary objective was to assess their level of satisfaction. Method This descriptive cross‐sectional study was conducted in a 500‐bed mother‐and‐child university hospital. A multidisciplinary group set up 30 situations and replicated a patient room and a care unit pharmacy. All hospital staff, including nurses, physicians, pharmacists and pharmacy technicians, was invited. Participants had to detect if a situation contained an error and fill out a response grid. They also answered a satisfaction survey. Results The simulation was held during 100 hours. A total of 230 professionals visited the simulation, 207 handed in a response grid and 136 answered the satisfaction survey. The participants' overall rate of correct answers was 67.5% ± 13.3% (4073/6036). Among the least detected errors were situations involving a Y‐site infusion incompatibility, an oral syringe preparation and the patient's identification. Participants mainly considered the simulation as effective in identifying incorrect practices (132/136, 97.8%) and relevant to their practice (129/136, 95.6%). Most of them (114/136; 84.4%) intended to change their practices in view of their exposure to the simulation. Conclusions We implemented a realistic medication‐use system errors simulation in a mother–child hospital, with a wide audience. This simulation was an effective, relevant and innovative tool to raise the health care professionals' awareness of critical processes.