Premium
Bifurcating effects of hope and support in short‐ and long‐term health outcomes among primary care patients without mental illness
Author(s) -
Katerndahl David
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
journal of evaluation in clinical practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.737
H-Index - 73
eISSN - 1365-2753
pISSN - 1356-1294
DOI - 10.1111/jep.12106
Subject(s) - stressor , social support , medicine , mental health , distress , depression (economics) , adverse effect , psychological intervention , psychiatry , psychology , clinical psychology , economics , psychotherapist , macroeconomics
Rationale Adverse life events and stressors can lead to symptoms, increased alcohol intake, and impaired functional status, while hope and social support can mitigate such adverse effects. Yet, there is reason to question such simple, linear relationships among healthy adults. The purpose of this study was to assess whether short‐term or long‐term changes in alcohol intake, psychological symptoms or functional status were better modelled as cusp catastrophic or linear processes among primary care patients without mental illness. Methods This secondary analysis of a study on the stability of psychological symptoms among primary care patients without mental disorders included 38 subjects who completed baseline, and 2‐month and/or 6‐month assessments of psychological symptoms, functional status and stressors as well as hope and social support. The analyses modelled short‐term and long‐term changes in alcohol intake, psychological symptoms and functional status using cusp catastrophe ( CCM ) and linear modelling. Results Overall, four of the nine 2‐month analyses found CCM superior to linear models; however, only one 6‐month analysis (alcohol intake) found that CCM was superior. The 2‐month cusp phenomena included both symptomatology and functional status. The asymmetry variables were often not significant in the CCM models; in fact, only distress was significant at all. While hope was a significant bifurcation variable at both the 2‐month and 6‐month levels, social support was a significant bifurcation variable for three of the four 2‐month CCM s. Conclusion In conclusion, while 6‐month outcomes were rarely explained through CCM , half of 2‐month outcomes were. Hope and support demonstrated bifurcation effects.