Uncovering values‐based practice: VBP 's implicit commitments to subjectivism and relativism

Despite assertions to the contrary, KWM F ulford's values‐based practice is implicitly committed to subjectivism when it comes to reasoning about values. This renders the approach unworkable. The act of merely uncovering underlying values is not enough to effect change and, therefore, resolve problems if we have no way, even in principle, of determining which values are right and which are wrong. F ulford's only departure from subjectivism about value is his commitment to ‘framework values’, which seems grounded in a version of ethical relativism. I argue that we need to reject both subjectivism and relativism if progress within ethical discussions about practice is to be meaningful and a real possibility.