Premium
Monitoring oriental fruit moth ( L epidoptera: T ortricidae) with the A jar bait trap in orchards under mating disruption
Author(s) -
Knight A.,
Basoalto E.,
Hilton R.,
Molinari F.,
Zoller B.,
Hansen R.,
Krawczyk G.,
Hull L.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
journal of applied entomology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.795
H-Index - 60
eISSN - 1439-0418
pISSN - 0931-2048
DOI - 10.1111/jen.12061
Subject(s) - biology , pheromone trap , mating disruption , trap (plumbing) , pheromone , sex pheromone , pest analysis , horticulture , botany , physics , meteorology
Studies in O regon, C alifornia, P ennsylvania and I taly evaluated the relative performance of the A jar trap compared with several other traps for the capture of G rapholita molesta (Busck), in pome and stone fruit orchards treated with sex pheromone dispensers for mating disruption. The A jar is a delta‐shaped trap with a screened jar filled with an aqueous terpinyl acetate plus brown sugar bait solution ( TAS ) that opens inside the trap and is surrounded by a sticky liner. The TAS ‐baited A jar trap was evaluated with and without the addition of a sex pheromone lure and compared with a delta trap baited with a sex pheromone lure and a bucket trap filled with the TAS bait. Although the A jar trap had a 90% lower evaporation of the TAS bait than the bucket trap, both of them caught similar numbers in the majority of the field tests of both sexes of G. molesta . The addition of the sex pheromone lure did not increase moth catches by the TAS ‐baited A jar trap. The TAS ‐baited A jar trap caught significantly greater numbers of moths than the sex pheromone‐baited delta trap in 18 of the 20 orchards. Few hymenopterans were caught in orange TAS ‐baited A jar traps, but the catch of flies and other moths relative to the target pest remained high. Flight tunnel and field tests evaluated the effect of several screen designs on the catches of G . molesta and non‐target species. All exclusion devices significantly reduced the catch of larger moths. However, designs that did not reduce the catch of male G . molesta did not reduce the catch of muscid flies. Exclusion devices with openings <7.0 mm significantly reduced the catch of female G . molesta . The addition of ( E )‐ β ‐farnesene, ( E )‐ β ‐ocimene or butyl hexanoate septa lures to TAS ‐baited A jar traps significantly increased total moth catch. The addition of ( E )‐ β ‐ocimene also significantly increased female moth catch.