Premium
Unpacking Negligence Liability: Experimentally Testing the Governance Effect
Author(s) -
Eisenberg Theodore,
Engel Christoph
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of empirical legal studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.529
H-Index - 24
eISSN - 1740-1461
pISSN - 1740-1453
DOI - 10.1111/jels.12099
Subject(s) - plaintiff , harm , morality , normative , intervention (counseling) , corporate governance , liability , tort , law , business , law and economics , political science , economics , psychology , finance , psychiatry
Arguably, if a court holds a defendant liable for negligently inflicting harm on the plaintiff, this intervention combines three effects: (1) the court specifies the normative expectation, (2) the court expresses dissatisfaction with the plaintiff's behavior, for example, her level of activity, and (3) the court obliges the defendant to compensate the plaintiff. In the field, it would be close to impossible to disentangle the three effects, or to investigate how they interact with intrinsic reticence to inflict harm on a passive outsider. We therefore go to the lab. We do not find an effect of intrinsic morality. However, the intervention has a separate significant effect on each of the three channels.