z-logo
Premium
Selfing rates vary with floral display, pollinator visitation and plant density in natural populations of Mimulus ringens
Author(s) -
Christopher Dorothy A.,
Karron Jeffrey D.,
Semski Wendy R.,
Smallwood Patrick A.,
Trapnell Dorset W.,
Mitchell Randall J.
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of evolutionary biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.289
H-Index - 128
eISSN - 1420-9101
pISSN - 1010-061X
DOI - 10.1111/jeb.13781
Subject(s) - selfing , biology , pollinator , mating system , ecology , genetic variation , pollination , adaptation (eye) , mating , evolutionary biology , population , genetics , pollen , demography , neuroscience , sociology , gene
Variation in selfing rates within and among populations of hermaphroditic flowering plants can strongly influence the evolution of reproductive strategies and the genetic structure of populations. This intraspecific variation in mating patterns may reflect both genetic and ecological factors, but the relative importance of these factors remains poorly understood. Here, we explore how selfing in 13 natural populations of the perennial wildflower Mimulus ringens is influenced by (a) pollinator visitation, an ecological factor, and (b) floral display, a trait with a genetic component that also responds to environmental variation. We also explore whether genetically based floral traits, including herkogamy, affect selfing. We found substantial variation among populations in selfing rate (0.13–0.55). Selfing increased strongly and significantly with floral display, among as well as within populations. Selfing also increased at sites with lower pollinator visitation and low plant density. However, selfing was not correlated with floral morphology. Overall, these results suggest that pollinator visitation and floral display, two factors that interact to affect geitonogamous pollinator movements, can influence the selfing rate. This study identifies mechanisms that may play a role in maintaining selfing rate variation among populations.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here