Premium
Genotypes and their interaction effects on reproduction and mating‐induced immune activation in Drosophila melanogaster
Author(s) -
Fricke Claudia,
ÁvilaCalero Sergio,
Armitage Sophie A. O.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of evolutionary biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.289
H-Index - 128
eISSN - 1420-9101
pISSN - 1010-061X
DOI - 10.1111/jeb.13625
Subject(s) - biology , mating , drosophila melanogaster , genotype , genetics , antagonistic coevolution , gene , zoology , melanogaster , reproductive isolation , evolutionary biology , sexual conflict , population , demography , sociology
Mating causes considerable alterations in female physiology and behaviour, and immune gene expression, partly due to proteins transferred from males to females during copulation. The magnitude of these phenotypic changes could be driven by the genotypes of males and females, as well as their interaction. To test this, we carried out a series of genotype‐by‐genotype (G × G) experiments using Drosophila melanogaster populations from two distant geographical locations. We expected lines to have diverged in male reproductive traits and females to differ in their responses to these traits. We examined female physiological and behavioural post‐mating responses to male mating traits, that is behaviour and ejaculate composition, in the short to mid‐term (48 hr) following mating. We then explored whether a sexually transferred molecule, sex peptide (SP), is the mechanism behind our observed female post‐mating responses. Our results show that the genotypes of both sexes as well as the interaction between male and female genotypes affect mating and post‐mating reproductive traits. Immune gene expression of three candidate genes increased in response to mating and was genotype‐dependent but did not show a G × G signature. Males showed genotype‐dependent SP expression in the 7 days following eclosion, but female genotypes showed no differential sensitivity to the receipt of SP. The two genotypes demonstrated clear divergence in physiological traits in short‐ to mid‐term responses to mating, but the longer‐term consequences of these initial dynamics remain to be uncovered.