Premium
Direct and indirect genetic effects on reproductive investment in a grasshopper
Author(s) -
Chakrabarty Anasuya,
Kronenberg Philipp,
Toliopoulos Nikolaos,
Schielzeth Holger
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of evolutionary biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.289
H-Index - 128
eISSN - 1420-9101
pISSN - 1010-061X
DOI - 10.1111/jeb.13417
Subject(s) - biology , grasshopper , evolutionary biology , zoology , ecology
A fundamental part of the quantitative genetic theory deals with the partitioning of the phenotypic variance into additive genetic and environmental components. During interaction with conspecifics, the interaction partner becomes a part of the environment from the perspective of the focal individual. If the interaction effects have a genetic basis, they are called indirect genetic effects ( IGE s) and can evolve along with direct genetic effects. Sexual reproduction is a classic context where potential conflict between males and females can arise from trade‐offs between current and future investments. We studied five female fecundity traits, egg length and number, egg pod length and number and latency to first egg pod, and estimated the direct and IGE s using a half‐sib breeding design in the grasshopper Chorthippus biguttulus . We found that the male IGE s were an order of magnitude lower than the direct genetic effects and were not significantly different from zero. However, there was some indication that IGE s were larger shortly after mating, consistent with the idea that IGE s fade with time after interaction. Female direct heritabilities were moderate to low. Simulation shows that the variance component estimates can appear larger with less data, calling for care when interpreting variance components estimated with low power. Our results illustrate that the contribution of male IGE s is overall low on the phenotypic variance of female fecundity traits. Thus, even in the relevant context of sexual conflict, the influence of male IGE s on the evolutionary trajectory of female reproductive traits is likely to be small.