Premium
A competitive environment influences sperm production, but not testes tissue composition, in house mice
Author(s) -
Firman Renée C.,
GarciaGonzalez Francisco,
Simmons Leigh W.,
André Gonçalo I.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
journal of evolutionary biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.289
H-Index - 128
eISSN - 1420-9101
pISSN - 1010-061X
DOI - 10.1111/jeb.13360
Subject(s) - sperm , biology , sperm competition , sperm motility , human fertilization , phenotypic plasticity , motility , spermatogenesis , andrology , competition (biology) , sexual selection , ecology , zoology , anatomy , endocrinology , microbiology and biotechnology , genetics , medicine
Due to the physiological cost of sperm production, males are expected to be prudent in their expenditure and adjust their investment according to current social conditions. Strategic adjustments in sperm expenditure during development can be made via changes in testes size, sperm production rates or testes tissue composition. Here, using house mice, we test the hypothesis that elevated sperm production is driven by a plastic response in the spatial organization of the testes. We reared males under different social conditions (competitive vs. noncompetitive) and quantified sperm number and the proportion of sperm‐producing tissue within the testes. Further, because sperm quality is a critical determinant of competitive fertilization success, we used computer‐assisted sperm analysis to quantify six sperm motility traits. Our investigation revealed that males reared in an environment with a perceived risk of reproductive competition produced more sperm in the absence of changes in testes morphology. We discuss this result in relation to fixed and flexible phenotypically plastic responses to future competitive conditions, and conclude that adaptive adjustments in sperm number in response to the social environment are likely attributable to variation in sperm production rate. Further, we found no difference in in vitro sperm motility parameters among males from the different social environment regimes. Overall, this investigation improves our understanding of the mechanisms of male plastic responses to reproductive competition experienced during sexual development.