Premium
Cultural and climatic changes shape the evolutionary history of the Uralic languages
Author(s) -
Honkola T,
Vesakoski O,
Korhonen K,
Lehtinen J,
Syrjänen K,
Wahlberg N
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
journal of evolutionary biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.289
H-Index - 128
eISSN - 1420-9101
pISSN - 1010-061X
DOI - 10.1111/jeb.12107
Subject(s) - abiotic component , divergence (linguistics) , diversification (marketing strategy) , biology , ecology , phylogenetics , phylogenetic tree , evolutionary biology , biotic component , linguistics , gene , philosophy , biochemistry , marketing , business
Quantitative phylogenetic methods have been used to study the evolutionary relationships and divergence times of biological species, and recently, these have also been applied to linguistic data to elucidate the evolutionary history of language families. In biology, the factors driving macroevolutionary processes are assumed to be either mainly biotic (the R ed Q ueen model) or mainly abiotic (the C ourt J ester model) or a combination of both. The applicability of these models is assumed to depend on the temporal and spatial scale observed as biotic factors act on species divergence faster and in smaller spatial scale than the abiotic factors. Here, we used the U ralic language family to investigate whether both ‘biotic’ interactions (i.e. cultural interactions) and abiotic changes (i.e. climatic fluctuations) are also connected to language diversification. We estimated the times of divergence using Bayesian phylogenetics with a relaxed‐clock method and related our results to climatic, historical and archaeological information. Our timing results paralleled the previous linguistic studies but suggested a later divergence of F inno‐ U gric, F innic and S aami languages. Some of the divergences co‐occurred with climatic fluctuation and some with cultural interaction and migrations of populations. Thus, we suggest that both ‘biotic’ and abiotic factors contribute either directly or indirectly to the diversification of languages and that both models can be applied when studying language evolution.