Premium
From nature to the laboratory: the impact of founder effects on adaptation
Author(s) -
Santos J.,
Pascual M.,
Simões P.,
Fragata I.,
Lima M.,
Kellen B.,
Santos M.,
Marques A.,
Rose M. R.,
Matos M.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal of evolutionary biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.289
H-Index - 128
eISSN - 1420-9101
pISSN - 1010-061X
DOI - 10.1111/jeb.12008
Subject(s) - biology , genetic drift , founder effect , adaptation (eye) , population , population bottleneck , natural selection , evolutionary biology , effective population size , population genetics , experimental evolution , genetic variation , neutral theory of molecular evolution , population size , allele , genetics , demography , gene , neuroscience , sociology , haplotype , microsatellite
Abstract Most founding events entail a reduction in population size, which in turn leads to genetic drift effects that can deplete alleles. Besides reducing neutral genetic variability, founder effects can in principle shift additive genetic variance for phenotypes that underlie fitness. This could then lead to different rates of adaptation among populations that have undergone a population size bottleneck as well as an environmental change, even when these populations have a common evolutionary history. Thus, theory suggests that there should be an association between observable genetic variability for both neutral markers and phenotypes related to fitness. Here, we test this scenario by monitoring the early evolutionary dynamics of six laboratory foundations derived from founders taken from the same source natural population of Drosophila subobscura . Each foundation was in turn three‐fold replicated. During their first few generations, these six foundations showed an abrupt increase in their genetic differentiation, within and between foundations. The eighteen populations that were monitored also differed in their patterns of phenotypic adaptation according to their immediately ancestral founding sample. Differences in early genetic variability and in effective population size were found to predict differences in the rate of adaptation during the first 21 generations of laboratory evolution. We show that evolution in a novel environment is strongly contingent not only on the initial composition of a newly founded population but also on the stochastic changes that occur during the first generations of colonization. Such effects make laboratory populations poor guides to the evolutionary genetic properties of their ancestral wild populations.