Premium
Safety in moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis patients with latent tuberculosis treated with guselkumab and anti‐tuberculosis treatments concomitantly: results from pooled phase 3 VOYAGE 1 & VOYAGE 2 trials
Author(s) -
Puig L.,
Tsai T.F.,
Bhutani T.,
Uy J.,
Ramachandran P.,
Song M.,
You Y.,
Gooderham M.,
Lebwohl M.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of the european academy of dermatology and venereology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.655
H-Index - 107
eISSN - 1468-3083
pISSN - 0926-9959
DOI - 10.1111/jdv.16460
Subject(s) - medicine , latent tuberculosis , adalimumab , concomitant , psoriasis , adverse effect , placebo , tuberculosis , isoniazid , gastroenterology , dermatology , mycobacterium tuberculosis , tumor necrosis factor alpha , pathology , alternative medicine
Abstract Background Patients treated with tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors are at risk of new‐onset tuberculosis (TB) or reactivation of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). Association between TB/LTBI and interleukin (IL)‐23 inhibitors for psoriasis is unclear. Patients with LTBI typically initiate LTBI therapy before receiving biologics. Objectives Safety in moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis patients with LTBI treated with guselkumab (IL‐23 inhibitor) and LTBI treatment was evaluated. Methods In the VOYAGE 1 & VOYAGE 2 studies, patients screened for LTBI were randomized to guselkumab, placebo, or adalimumab (TNF inhibitor) at baseline. Placebo → guselkumab crossover occurred at week 16 and adalimumab → guselkumab at week 52 (VOYAGE 1), or at week 28 or later (VOYAGE 2). Incidence of active TB, adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), and markedly abnormal liver function tests [alanine aminotransferase test (ALT); aspartate aminotransferase test (AST)] were evaluated using pooled data through week 100 in guselkumab‐treated patients receiving and not receiving LTBI treatment. Results At baseline, 130 randomized patients (guselkumab: n = 69; adalimumab: n = 36; placebo: n = 25) tested positive for LTBI and received concomitant LTBI treatments (LTBI+). No active TB was reported among guselkumab‐treated patients without LTBI (LTBI−) through week 100. Two cases of active TB occurred in LTBI− patients treated with adalimumab. Through week 16, across all treatment groups, greater proportions of LTBI+ patients reported ALT and AST elevations compared with LTBI− patients. Through week 100, proportions of patients experiencing AEs and SAEs were comparable between LTBI+ and LTBI− patients. Conclusions No cases of active TB, including reactivation of LTBI, were reported in patients with or without LTBI treated with guselkumab through up to 2 years. LTBI treatment was effective across all treatment groups in preventing reactivation of LTBI. Long‐term treatment with guselkumab was generally well‐tolerated through up to 2 years in patients receiving LTBI medications.