Premium
Observer‐independent assessment of psoriasis‐affected area using machine learning
Author(s) -
Meienberger N.,
Anzengruber F.,
Amruthalingam L.,
Christen R.,
Koller T.,
Maul J.T.,
Pouly M,
Djamei V.,
Navarini A.A.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of the european academy of dermatology and venereology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.655
H-Index - 107
eISSN - 1468-3083
pISSN - 0926-9959
DOI - 10.1111/jdv.16002
Subject(s) - medicine , psoriasis , psoriasis area and severity index , observer (physics) , quality assessment , artificial intelligence , medical physics , physical therapy , machine learning , dermatology , pathology , computer science , external quality assessment , physics , quantum mechanics
Background Assessment of psoriasis severity is strongly observer‐dependent, and objective assessment tools are largely missing. The increasing number of patients receiving highly expensive therapies that are reimbursed only for moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis motivates the development of higher quality assessment tools. Objective To establish an accurate and objective psoriasis assessment method based on segmenting images by machine learning technology. Methods In this retrospective, non‐interventional, single‐centred, interdisciplinary study of diagnostic accuracy, 259 standardized photographs of Caucasian patients were assessed and typical psoriatic lesions were labelled. Two hundred and three of those were used to train and validate an assessment algorithm which was then tested on the remaining 56 photographs. The results of the algorithm assessment were compared with manually marked area, as well as with the affected area determined by trained dermatologists. Results Algorithm assessment achieved accuracy of more than 90% in 77% of the images and differed on average 5.9% from manually marked areas. The difference between algorithm‐predicted and photograph‐based estimated areas by physicians was 8.1% on average. Conclusion The study shows the potential of the evaluated technology. In contrast to the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), it allows for objective evaluation and should therefore be developed further as an alternative method to human assessment.