Premium
Ungual warts: comparison of treatment with intralesional bleomycin and electroporation in terms of efficacy and safety
Author(s) -
Di Chiacchio N.G.,
Di Chiacchio N.,
Criado P.R.,
Brunner C.H.M.,
Suaréz M.V.R.,
Belda Junior W.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of the european academy of dermatology and venereology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.655
H-Index - 107
eISSN - 1468-3083
pISSN - 0926-9959
DOI - 10.1111/jdv.15815
Subject(s) - medicine , bleomycin , dermatology , electroporation , safety profile , surgery , adverse effect , chemotherapy , biochemistry , chemistry , gene
Background Ungual warts are considered the most common benign nail tumour, and they are caused by the human papillomavirus. Despite the numerous treatments reported in the medical literature, ungual warts are considered frustrating, with high relapse rates and a potential risk of nail dystrophy. Bleomycin is a therapeutic option showing a good safety profile and high cure rates. Objective To evaluate the efficacy of electrochemotherapy using intralesional bleomycin for the treatment of ungual warts in comparison with intralesional bleomycin alone and describe the side‐effects related to the use of both techniques. Methods This was a prospective, randomized, double‐blind, controlled clinical trial. Forty‐four 18‐ to 60‐year‐old female and male patients with ungual warts of only one finger were included. The patients were divided into two treatment groups: GA – intralesional bleomycin; and GB – electroporation and intralesional bleomycin. Following a single application, the patients were followed up for 180 days. Results The patients’ mean age was 36 years for GA and 37 years for GB . Most patients were female (68%). Of 22 patients in GA completing the study, 11 (50%) achieved the cure, while 18 (85.7%) of 21 patients completing the study in GB showed cure. A significant association of patients with or without cure after the GA and GB treatments ( P = 0.022) was observed. None of the patients in either group had systemic side‐effects. Independent of the technique used, all the participants considered the adverse effects tolerable. Conclusion The intralesional use of bleomycin associated with electroporation for the treatment of ungual warts (both periungual and subungual) showed a statistically superior cure when compared with intralesional bleomycin alone. Side‐effects were more frequently observed in the electrochemotherapy with bleomycin group than in the bleomycin monotherapy group.