z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Randomized trial of an intensified, multifactorial intervention in patients with advanced‐stage diabetic kidney disease: Diabetic Nephropathy Remission and Regression Team Trial in Japan (DNETT‐Japan)
Author(s) -
Shikata Kenichi,
Haneda Masakazu,
Ninomiya Toshiharu,
Koya Daisuke,
Suzuki Yoshiki,
Suzuki Daisuke,
Ishida Hitoshi,
Akai Hiroaki,
Tomino Yasuhiko,
Uzu Takashi,
Nishimura Motonobu,
Maeda Shiro,
Ogawa Daisuke,
Miyamoto Satoshi,
Makino Hirofumi
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of diabetes investigation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.089
H-Index - 50
eISSN - 2040-1124
pISSN - 2040-1116
DOI - 10.1111/jdi.13339
Subject(s) - medicine , hazard ratio , kidney disease , creatinine , confidence interval , diabetic nephropathy , diabetes mellitus , renal function , population , albuminuria , randomized controlled trial , gastroenterology , urology , kidney , endocrinology , environmental health
Aims/Introduction We evaluated the efficacy of multifactorial intensive treatment (IT) on renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and advanced‐stage diabetic kidney disease (DKD). Materials and Methods The Diabetic Nephropathy Remission and Regression Team Trial in Japan (DNETT‐Japan) is a multicenter, open‐label, randomized controlled trial with a 5‐year follow‐up period. We randomly assigned 164 patients with advanced‐stage diabetic kidney disease (urinary albumin‐to‐creatinine ratio ≥300 mg/g creatinine, serum creatinine level 1.2–2.5 mg/dL in men and 1.0–2.5 mg/dL in women) to receive either IT or conventional treatment. The primary composite outcome was end‐stage kidney failure, doubling of serum creatinine or death from any cause, which was assessed in the intention‐to‐treat population. Results The IT tended to reduce the risk of primary end‐points as compared with conventional treatment, but the difference between treatment groups did not reach the statistically significant level (hazard ratio 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.43–1.11; P  = 0.13). Meanwhile, the decrease in serum low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol level and the use of statin were significantly associated with the decrease in primary outcome (hazard ratio 1.14; 95% confidence interval 1.05–1.23, P  < 0.001 and hazard ratio 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.28–0.998, P  < 0.05, respectively). The incidence of adverse events was not different between treatment groups. Conclusions The risk of kidney events tended to decrease by IT, although it was not statistically significant. Lipid control using statin was associated with a lower risk of adverse kidney events. Further follow‐up study might show the effect of IT in patients with advanced diabetic kidney disease.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here