Open Access
Ipragliflozin, a sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, reduces bodyweight and fat mass, but not muscle mass, in Japanese type 2 diabetes patients treated with insulin: A randomized clinical trial
Author(s) -
Inoue Hideka,
Morino Katsutaro,
Ugi Satoshi,
TanakaMizuno Sachiko,
Fuse Keiko,
Miyazawa Itsuko,
Kondo Keiko,
Sato Daisuke,
Ohashi Natsuko,
Ida Shogo,
Sekine Osamu,
Yoshimura Masahiro,
Murata Kiyoshi,
Miura Katsuyuki,
Arima Hisatomi,
Maegawa Hiroshi
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of diabetes investigation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.089
H-Index - 50
eISSN - 2040-1124
pISSN - 2040-1116
DOI - 10.1111/jdi.12985
Subject(s) - medicine , bioelectrical impedance analysis , glycated hemoglobin , endocrinology , glycemic , type 2 diabetes , diabetes mellitus , insulin , lean body mass , body mass index , hypoglycemia , body weight
Abstract Aims/Introduction Sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors reduce bodyweight (BW) by creating a negative energy balance. Previous reports have suggested that this BW reduction is mainly loss of body fat and that ~20% of the reduction is lean mass. However, the effects of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors on BW and body composition remain unclear. We examined these effects in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with insulin. Materials and Methods In this open‐label, randomized controlled trial, 49 overweight patients (body mass index ≥23 kg/m 2 ) with inadequate glycemic control (hemoglobin A1c >7.0%) receiving insulin treatment were randomly assigned to receive add‐on ipragliflozin or no additional treatment (control group). Patients were followed for 24 weeks. The goal for all patients was to achieve glycated hemoglobin <7.0% without hypoglycemia. The primary end‐point was a change in BW from baseline to week 24. Body composition was assessed with dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry and bioelectrical impedance analysis. Results BW change was significantly larger in the ipragliflozin group than in the control group (−2.78 vs −0.22 kg, P < 0.0001). Total fat mass was reduced evenly in the arms, lower limbs and trunk in the ipragliflozin group. Total muscle mass and bone mineral content were maintained, but muscle mass in the arms might have been affected by ipragliflozin treatment. Conclusions Ipragliflozin treatment for 24 weeks resulted in reduced BW, mainly from fat mass loss. Muscle mass and bone mineral content were maintained. Further study is necessary to elucidate the long‐term effects of ipragliflozin.