Premium
Adverse drug reactions with oral anticoagulants: data from sicilian spontaneous reporting system database
Author(s) -
Barbieri Maria Antonietta,
Cutroneo Paola Maria,
Baratelli Chiara,
Cicala Giuseppe,
Battaglia Alessandro,
Santoro Vincenza,
Andò Giuseppe,
Spina Edoardo
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.622
H-Index - 73
eISSN - 1365-2710
pISSN - 0269-4727
DOI - 10.1111/jcpt.13391
Subject(s) - medicine , edoxaban , dabigatran , acenocoumarol , rivaroxaban , apixaban , warfarin , gastrointestinal bleeding , atrial fibrillation
Objective Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were developed to avoid the limitations of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). DOACs are associated with a greater incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding and a smaller number of intracranial haemorrhages than VKAs. Therefore, it is important to deepen our knowledge of their safety profiles. The aim of this study was thus to analyse adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports on DOACs and VKAs using the Sicilian Spontaneous Reporting System (SRS) database. Methods All ADR reports with DOACs and VKAs as suspected drugs that were entered into the Sicilian SRS database during the period 2001–2019 were selected. In detail, all reports with the following single active substances were included: dabigatran etexilate, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban; acenocoumarol and warfarin were included as a comparator group. Descriptive statistical methodology was used to evaluate characteristics of the reported cases with a case‐by‐case assessment. Results and Discussion Out of 521 reports related to anticoagulants, 444 (85.2%) and 77 (14.8%) involved DOACs and VKAs, respectively. DOAC‐related reports were mainly of gastrointestinal disorders. In contrast, VKAs were mostly associated with blood and lymphatic system disorders, injury, investigations and vascular disorders. Many more cases of ADRs in the form of gastrointestinal disorders concerned dabigatran etexilate ( n = 179, 73.7%) than the other DOACs, while ADRs in the form of blood disorders were mainly associated with acenocoumarol ( n = 27, 57.4%). The most commonly reported Preferred Terms for DOACs were dyspepsia ( n = 89, 17.1%), upper abdominal pain ( n = 41, 9.2%) and pruritus ( n = 26, 5.8%), whereas for VKAs, they were anaemia ( n = 21, 27.3%) and hypocoagulable state ( n = 18, 3.5%). Potentially interacting concomitant medications particularly included antithrombotic agents ( n = 19, 4.3%) for DOACs and proton‐pump inhibitors (PPIs) ( n = 37, 48.1%) and antithrombotic agents ( n = 13, 16.9%) for VKAs. Conclusion The ADRs most commonly associated with DOACs, especially dabigatran, were gastrointestinal disorders, particularly gastrointestinal bleeding. Our study also highlights the potential role of drug‐drug interactions in the ADRs. The cases of gastrointestinal bleeding highlight the need for careful prescribing of DOACs and use of potentially interacting concomitant drugs.