Premium
Factors influencing caspofungin plasma concentrations in kidney transplant patients with high incidence of invasive fungal infections
Author(s) -
Yang Qianting,
Zhang Tao,
Zhao Dan,
Zhang Ying,
Dong Yuzhu,
Sun Dan,
Du Qian,
Zheng Jing,
Lu Haidong,
Dong Yalin
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.622
H-Index - 73
eISSN - 1365-2710
pISSN - 0269-4727
DOI - 10.1111/jcpt.13026
Subject(s) - caspofungin , concomitant , medicine , cmin , kidney transplantation , chemoprophylaxis , aspergillosis , transplantation , fluconazole , pharmacokinetics , immunology , antifungal , cmax , dermatology
What is known and objective Caspofungin is commonly used in kidney transplant patients for prophylaxis or treatment of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) caused by Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp. Factors such as concomitant medications, co‐morbidity and rejection often cause caspofungin pharmacokinetic parameters alterations in kidney transplant patients. Here, we aimed to investigate factors influencing caspofungin plasma concentrations and evaluate its prophylaxis and treatment efficiency for IFIs in kidney transplant patients. Methods The prophylaxis and treatment efficiency of caspofungin for IFIs were assessed in 164 kidney transplant patients in the study. Six hundred and fifty‐two caspofungin trough concentrations (C min ) from the 164 patients were monitored by the liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry method. Basic demographic variables, baseline disease, surgery, rejection, indwelling catheter, coinfection, concomitant medication and other caspofungin‐related factors were collected. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to assess factors influencing caspofungin plasma concentrations. Results and discussion The success rates were 94.96% (132/139) for caspofungin prevention and 80% (20/25) for caspofungin for IFIs. Caspofungin C min in the kidney recipients varied largely compared with healthy volunteers (0.10‐12.25 mg/L vs. 1.12‐1.78 mg/L). Caspofungin C min significantly increased in patients with continuous renal replacement therapy before transplantation ( P = .001), concomitant medication of cyclosporine A (CsA, P = .009), ALB concentration of > 30 g/L ( P = .019). What is new and conclusion This is an uncontrolled observational study of caspofungin as prophylaxis or treatment for IFIs in kidney transplant patients. Caspofungin could be an effective and well‐tolerated option for antifungal prophylaxis and treatment in kidney transplant patients, and a number of factors could influence caspofungin C min in these patients.