Premium
An 11‐year retrospective review of cyproheptadine use in serotonin syndrome cases reported to the California Poison Control System
Author(s) -
Nguyen Hien,
Pan Angel,
Smollin Craig,
Cantrell Lee F.,
Kearney Tom
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.622
H-Index - 73
eISSN - 1365-2710
pISSN - 0269-4727
DOI - 10.1111/jcpt.12796
Subject(s) - cyproheptadine , medicine , serotonin syndrome , serotonin , retrospective cohort study , anesthesia , pediatrics , serotonergic , receptor
Summary What is known Cyproheptadine is a serotonin and histamine antagonist that has been suggested as a treatment for serotonin syndrome in case reports. Objective We sought to examine the differences between outcomes and treatment recommendations in patients who received and did not receive cyproheptadine for a probable serotonin syndrome. Methods A retrospective review of cases reported to the California Poison Control System between 2006 and 2017 involving cyproheptadine administration or consideration for treatment of a probable serotonin syndrome. Results and discussion A total of 1420 cases were identified and 288 cases met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 68 (23.1%) patients received cyproheptadine treatment and were significantly older (mean age 49.7 vs 33.5 years, P < 0.00001), intubated (n = 35, 51% vs n = 62, 28%, P < 0.05) and, although not statistically significant, were more frequently admitted to a critical care unit (n = 56, 82.3% vs n = 154, 70.0%, P = 0.09). There were no significant differences in serious outcomes (moderate or worse effects) or hospitalization rates (OR, 1.09, 95% CI, 0.49‐2.64 and OR, 1.99, 95% CI, 0.86‐4.58). There were eight fatalities, of which two patients received cyproheptadine. All fatalities were acute polypharmacy ingestions and had manifested severe symptoms (seizures, hypotension or hyperthermia) either prior to the administration or consideration of cyproheptadine therapy. Cyproheptadine was not administered in 138 (48%) cases primarily due to minimal clinical severity and patient improvement (43%), and not recommended in 82 (28%) cases for reasons from waiting for response to other supportive measures (30%), limited evidence of efficacy (28%) and undetermined diagnosis (14.6%). What is new and conclusion The benefits of and indications for cyproheptadine are uncertain and questionable for the management of a serotonin syndrome. Future recommendations on its use should be based on diagnostic criteria, severity of symptoms and management in conjunction with other supportive measures.