Premium
The clinical analgesic efficacy of buprenorphine
Author(s) -
Raffa R. B.,
Haidery M.,
Huang H.M.,
Kalladeen K.,
Lockstein D. E.,
Ono H.,
Shope M. J.,
Sowunmi O. A.,
Tran J. K.,
Pergolizzi J. V.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.622
H-Index - 73
eISSN - 1365-2710
pISSN - 0269-4727
DOI - 10.1111/jcpt.12196
Subject(s) - buprenorphine , analgesic , medicine , partial agonist , agonist , fentanyl , clinical trial , pharmacology , morphine , anesthesia , opioid , receptor
Summary What is known and objective Based on in vitro assays and select animal models, buprenorphine is commonly called a ‘partial agonist’. An implication is that it should produce less analgesic effect in humans than so‐called ‘full agonists’ such as morphine or fentanyl. However, buprenorphine has a multimechanistic pharmacology, and thus partial agonism at a specific receptor is not particularly relevant to its overall analgesic action. We review published clinical trials that directly compared the magnitude of buprenorphine's analgesic effect to analgesics commonly considered full agonists. Comment Due to different signal transduction pathways, a drug can be a full agonist on one endpoint and a partial agonist on another. Therefore, we limited the present review to buprenorphine's analgesic effect. What is new and conclusion Twenty‐four controlled clinical trials were identified, plus a case report and dose–response curve. Based on complete or comparable pain relief, in buprenorphine had full clinical analgesic efficacy in 25 of the 26 studies.