Premium
Commentary: Splitting and lumping brain and childhood adversity measures – a commentary on Gheorghe, Li, Gallacher, and Bauermeister (2020)
Author(s) -
Tiemeier Henning
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of child psychology and psychiatry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.652
H-Index - 211
eISSN - 1469-7610
pISSN - 0021-9630
DOI - 10.1111/jcpp.13346
Subject(s) - psychology , neglect , neuroimaging , developmental psychology , child abuse , early childhood , clinical psychology , poison control , injury prevention , psychiatry , medicine , environmental health
The article by Gheorghe, Li, Gallacher & Bauermeister (2020) reports a neuroimaging study of childhood adversity assessed retrospectively in persons aged, on average, 62 years. Severe child maltreatment has repeatedly been related to enduring alterations in brain structure. These studies are typically conducted in high‐risk samples, often combining different forms of adversity that co‐occur in one adversity score. The authors chose to separately analyse each of three adversity questions that tap into emotional abuse, neglect and physical abuse. In contrast, the brain structural measures are combined to several latent variables. In this commentary, I argue that this analytical strategy, which runs counter to the common practice, is a strength of the study. As such, it provides important evidence of long‐term brain developmental consequences of early adversities. The results suggest that memories of emotional abuse, but not other common adversities, are associated with differences in the cerebellum and part of the striatum only.