z-logo
Premium
Efficacy of adjunctive anti‐plaque chemical agents: a systematic review and network meta‐analyses of the Turesky modification of the Quigley and Hein plaque index
Author(s) -
Escribano Marta,
Figuero Elena,
Martín Conchita,
Tobías Aurelio,
Serrano Jorge,
Roldán Silvia,
Herrera David
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of clinical periodontology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.456
H-Index - 151
eISSN - 1600-051X
pISSN - 0303-6979
DOI - 10.1111/jcpe.12616
Subject(s) - meta analysis , medicine , dental plaque , dentistry , pathology
Aim The aim of this systematic review and network meta‐analysis (NMA) was to compare the efficacy of different anti‐plaque chemical agents, in 6‐month, home‐use, randomized clinical trials (RCTs), in terms of plaque index (PlI) changes. Material and Methods RCTs assessing PlI were identified, screened, and evaluated for inclusion. Relevant information was extracted, and quality and risk of bias were assessed. Mean differences between baseline‐end were calculated to obtain weighted mean differences and 95% confidence intervals. NMA protocols were applied to assess direct and indirect comparisons among products using Turesky PlI. Results Eighty‐three papers were included: 49 examined dentifrices, 32 mouthrinses and 2 both. The NMA analysed 51 studies including data from 4242 and 4180 subjects for dentifrices and mouthrinses respectively. For dentifrices, triclosan‐copolymer and chlorhexidine showed the greatest effect, with significant differences when compared with stannous fluoride. For mouthrinses, essential oils and chlorhexidine showed the greatest effect, with significant differences when compared with delmopinol, alexidine and cetylpyridinium chloride. Conclusion Within the limitations of this study (including the severe imbalance in the amount of evidence), dentifrices containing triclosan‐copolymer or chlorhexidine and mouthrinses containing essential oils or chlorhexidine showed the greatest effect on PlI scores as assessed with NMA.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here