Premium
When Optimism Fails: Liberal Intergovernmentalism and Citizen Representation*
Author(s) -
Hix Simon
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
jcms: journal of common market studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.54
H-Index - 90
eISSN - 1468-5965
pISSN - 0021-9886
DOI - 10.1111/jcms.12785
Subject(s) - intergovernmentalism , gridlock , salience (neuroscience) , political economy , representation (politics) , politics , political science , democratic deficit , positive economics , optimism , democracy , law and economics , european union , economics , social psychology , european integration , law , psychology , economic policy , cognitive psychology
Liberal Intergovernmentalism has a particular set of assumptions about the relationship between voters and governments. Either voters are content to trust their governments, because issues have low salience, or governments react to voters’ preferences. How far is this ‘supply side’ of the theory still valid in the newly politicized world of EU politics? This article discusses the assumptions about representation in the theory, and looks at the conditions under which the assumptions might still hold and what this means for EU politics today. If the representational assumptions still hold in this highly politicized EU world, then the theory would predict policy gridlock. On the other hand, if there is a growing gap between publics and elites, then the assumptions, and the related propositions about the democratic deficit, no‐longer hold. Either way, the inherent optimism of the theory is undermined.