Premium
Explaining Participation Bias in the European Commission's Online Consultations: The Struggle for Policy Gain without too Much Pain
Author(s) -
Røed Maiken,
Wøien Hansen Vibeke
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
jcms: journal of common market studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.54
H-Index - 90
eISSN - 1468-5965
pISSN - 0021-9886
DOI - 10.1111/jcms.12754
Subject(s) - salience (neuroscience) , commission , salient , european commission , baseline (sea) , test (biology) , political science , psychology , public economics , public relations , european union , economics , cognitive psychology , international economics , law , paleontology , biology
This article investigates participation bias in the European Commission's online consultations by focusing on issue characteristics and using a cost–benefit framework. The main assumption is that a group will choose not to participate when their participation costs exceed the expected benefits. This leads to a more biased participation pattern. We expect this to hold when the proposal discussed in a consultation is more complex, whereas the opposite is the case if the proposal is more salient. Furthermore, we expect there to be an interaction effect between complexity and salience. We test and find support for these expectations in an analysis of more than 350 consultations held between 2001 and 2012.