z-logo
Premium
Where Does the Buck Stop? Explaining Public Responsibility Attributions in Complex International Institutions
Author(s) -
Rittberger Berthold,
Schwarzenbeck Helena,
Zangl Bernhard
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
jcms: journal of common market studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.54
H-Index - 90
eISSN - 1468-5965
pISSN - 0021-9886
DOI - 10.1111/jcms.12524
Subject(s) - attribution , refugee , accountability , distribution (mathematics) , welfare , member states , political science , moral responsibility , public policy , public administration , public economics , business , economics , law , international trade , european union , social psychology , psychology , mathematical analysis , mathematics
Who is held publicly responsible for the policies of international institutions? Are member states or supranational bodies held responsible or are public responsibility attributions (PRA) untargeted? We argue that in complex policy‐making systems responsibility tends to be attributed to implementing actors. When, however, a policy does not require active implementation, we expect responsibility attributions to be untargeted. To test these expectations, we analyze PRA in the European public for three EU migration policies: (1) border control policies, (2) the distribution of refugees according to the ‘Dublin’‐system, and (3) so‐called welfare migration facilitated by the ‘freedom of movement’ principle. Our analysis corroborates that PRA reflect the structure of policy implementation: (1) PRA for EU border controls target the EU; (2) PRA for the distribution of refugees target member states; (3) PRA for welfare migration are untargeted. The paper thus highlights an accountability gap for policies that do not require implementation.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here