z-logo
Premium
EU –Turkey: Integration without Full Membership or Membership without Full Integration? A Conceptual Framework for Accession Alternatives
Author(s) -
Karakas Cemal
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
jcms: journal of common market studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.54
H-Index - 90
eISSN - 1468-5965
pISSN - 0021-9886
DOI - 10.1111/jcms.12061
Subject(s) - accession , conditionality , context (archaeology) , scope (computer science) , depreciation (economics) , political science , conceptual framework , economic system , economics , international economics , european union , sociology , microeconomics , law , computer science , geography , politics , social science , profit (economics) , archaeology , capital formation , financial capital , programming language
The EU accession aspirations of the de jure   E uropean country T urkey remain a highly contested issue. Due to the national preferences and mainly socio‐cultural resentment in some EU Member States and due to its limited integration capacity, the EU offered A nkara a discriminatory ‘full membership minus’. The current EU law and the various paradigms of ‘differentiated integration’ do not only provide the spatial, temporal and thematic scope for a conceptual framework on accession alternatives, they also limit it. In this context, the gradual integration/membership concept could be an interesting option for both parties. The depreciation of full membership in the case of T urkey has weakened the EU conditionality policy in general. On the other hand, ‘external’ flexibilization can help to overcome deadlock by allowing the M ember S tates and accession candidates such as T urkey to co‐operate at different levels of integration.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom