Open AccessPreclinical evaluation of exemestane as a novel chemotherapy for gastric cancer
Author(s) -
Yang JuanCheng,
Chang Ning,
Wu DengChyang,
Cheng WeiChung,
Chung WeiMin,
Chang WeiChun,
Lei FuJu,
Liu ChungJung,
Wu IChen,
Lai HsuehChou,
Ma WenLung
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of cellular and molecular medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.44
H-Index - 130
eISSN - 1582-4934
pISSN - 1582-1838
DOI - 10.1111/jcmm.14605
Subject(s) - exemestane , medicine , cancer , aromatase , oncology , breast cancer , biomarker , cancer research , pharmacology , biology , biochemistry
CYP19A1/aromatase (Ar) is a prognostic biomarker of gastric cancer (GCa). Ar is a critical enzyme for converting androstenedione to oestradiol in the steroidogenesis cascade. For decades, Ar has been targeted with Ar inhibitors (ARIs) in gynaecologic malignancies; however, it is unexplored in GCa. A single‐cohort tissue microarray examination was conducted to study the association between Ar expression and disease outcome in Asian patients with GCa. The results revealed that Ar was a prognostic promoter. Bioinformatics analyses conducted on a Caucasian‐based cDNA microarray databank showed Ar to be positively associated with GCa prognosis for multiple clinical modalities, including surgery, 5‐Fluorouracil (5‐FU) for adjuvant chemotherapy, or HER2 positivity. These findings imply that targeting Ar expression exhibits a potential for fulfilling unmet medical needs. Hence, Ar‐targeting compounds were tested, and the results showed that exemestane exhibited superior cancer‐suppressing efficacy to other ARIs. In addition, exemestane down‐regulated Ar expression. Ablating Ar abundance with short hairpin (sh)Ar could also suppress GCa cell growth, and adding 5‐FU could facilitate this effect. Notably, adding oestradiol could not prevent exemestane or shAr effects, implicating a nonenzymatic mechanism of Ar in cancer growth. Regarding translational research, treatment with exemestane alone exhibited tumour suppression efficacy in a dose‐dependent manner. Combining subminimal doses of 5‐FU and exemestane exerted an excellent tumour suppression effect without influencing bodyweight. This study validated the therapeutic potentials of exemestane in GCa. Combination of metronomic 5‐FU and exemestane for GCa therapy is recommended.