
Hepatitis C virus NS 3‐4A inhibits the peroxisomal MAVS ‐dependent antiviral signalling response
Author(s) -
Ferreira Ana R.,
Magalhães Ana C.,
Camões Fátima,
Gouveia Ana,
Vieira Marta,
Kagan Jonathan C.,
Ribeiro Daniela
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of cellular and molecular medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.44
H-Index - 130
eISSN - 1582-4934
pISSN - 1582-1838
DOI - 10.1111/jcmm.12801
Subject(s) - peroxisome , biology , microbiology and biotechnology , rig i , cytosol , mitochondrion , virology , effector , coxsackievirus , ns3 , hepatitis c virus , virus , innate immune system , receptor , enzyme , biochemistry , enterovirus
Hepatitis C virus ( HCV ) is the cause of one of the most prevalent viral infections worldwide. Upon infection, the HCV genome activates the RIG ‐I‐ MAVS signalling pathway leading to the production of direct antiviral effectors which prevent important steps in viral propagation. MAVS localizes at peroxisomes and mitochondria and coordinate the activation of an effective antiviral response: peroxisomal MAVS is responsible for a rapid but short‐termed antiviral response, while the mitochondrial MAVS is associated with the activation of a stable response with delayed kinetics. The HCV NS 3‐4A protease was shown to specifically cleave the mitochondrial MAVS , inhibiting the downstream response. In this study, we have analysed whether HCV NS 3‐4A is also able to cleave the peroxisomal MAVS and whether this would have any effect on the cellular antiviral response. We show that NS 3‐4A is indeed able to specifically cleave this protein and release it into the cytosol, a mechanism that seems to occur at a similar kinetic rate as the cleavage of the mitochondrial MAVS . Under these conditions, RIG‐I‐like receptor (RLR) signalling from peroxisomes is blocked and antiviral gene expression is inhibited. Our results also show that NS 3‐4A is able to localize at peroxisomes in the absence of MAVS . However, mutation studies have shown that this localization pattern is preferred in the presence of a fully cleavable MAVS . These findings present evidence of a viral evasion strategy that disrupts RLR signalling on peroxisomes and provide an excellent example of how a single viral evasion strategy can block innate immune signalling from different organelles.